Fraktionsvorsitzende der LINKEN in Hessen. Mitglied u.a. bei Marx 21 und ver.di.
2. âWiderstandâ wird heutzutage ganz besonders im kulturellen Raum verortet, als politische ĂuĂerung gegen den "Alltagswahn". Welche implizite (wenn nicht gar explizite) Unterscheidung sehen Sie hier zwischen einer politischen Praxis, die sich gegen die Gesellschaft als Ganzes richtet, und den scheinbar einfacheren Anliegen alltĂ€glichen Daseins?
3. Wo sehen Sie die Ursachen und Folgen dieser historischen Wendung weg von Bewegungen fĂŒr reformistische oder revolutionĂ€re Politik, hin zu Taktiken, Strategien, und dem SelbstverstĂ€ndnis von âWiderstandâ als Praxis?
4. Wohin deuten diese Akte des âWiderstandesâ, Ihrer EinschĂ€tzung nach, fĂŒr mögliche soziale Emanzipation, heute und in der Zukunft?
5. Welche VerĂ€nderungen sozialer Probleme stehen uns heute bevor? Auf welche Art und Weise werden sich diese potentiellen VerĂ€nderungen Ă€uĂern?
6. Welche Taktiken und Strategien kann und soll eine Linke, die sich sozialer Emanzipation verpflichtet fĂŒhlt, wĂ€hlen, um diesen Wandel zu ermöglichen?
//Chicago, November 2007:
Panelists:
Michael Albert (Z Magazine, author of Parecon: Life After Capitalism), Chris Cutrone (Platypus) [Chris Cutrone's opening remarks prepared text], Stephen Duncombe (Gallatin School of New York University, editor of Cultural Resistance Reader), Brian Holmes (Continental Driftand Université Tangente), and Marisa Holmes (new Students for a Democratic Society).
//Boston, April 2012
Panelists:
Jeff Booth (Socialist Alternative)
Gayge (Common Struggle Libertarian Communist Federation)
Joe Ramsey (Kasama Project)
Laura Lee Schmidt (Platypus)
J. Phil Thompson (MIT)
//New York, April 2012
Panelists:
Todd Gitlin (Columbia University)
Tom Trottier (Workersâ International Committee)
Ross Wolfe (Platypus Affiliated Society)
//Toronto (Canada), March 2012
Panelists:
Clare OâConnor,
Baolinh Dang (Proletarian Revolutionary Action Committee- Revolutionary Students Movement),
Cam Hardy (Platypus),
Megan Kinch (#Occupy, Toronto Media Co-Op), and
Jim Stanford (Canadian Auto Workers).
//Halifax (Canada), January 2012
Panelists:
Eric Anatolik (Occupy NS), Jacques Beaudoin (Parti communiste revolutionnaire â Revolutionary Communist Party, Canada) Howard Epstein (New Democratic Party MLA Halifax Chebucto), Max Haiven (Edu-Factory, Historical and Critical Studies NSCAD) and Andony Melathopoulos (Platypus). The panel was moderated by Pam Nogales.
germany.platypus1917.org
Die Platypus Affiliated Society organisiert Lesekreise, öffentliche Veranstaltungen, VortrĂ€ge, Forschung und Journalismus im Hinblick auf ĂŒberkommene, ungelöste Probleme und Aufgaben der âAltenâ (1920er-30er), âNeuenâ (1960er-70er) und post-politischen (1980er-90er) Linken und der Möglichkeiten fĂŒr emanzipatorische Politik heute.
A panel discussion with audience Q&A on the problematic forms of anti-capitalism today, held on May 30th at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH).
Transcribed in Platypus Review #53
âAfter the failure of the 1960s New Left, the underlying despair with regard to the real efficacy of political will, of political agency, in a historical situation of heightened helplessness, became a self-constitution as outsider, as other, rather than an instrument of transformation. Focused on the bureaucratic stasis of the Fordist, late 20th Century world, the Left echoed the destruction of that world by the dynamics of capital: neoliberalism and globalization.
The idea of a fundamental transformation became bracketed and, instead, was replaced by the more ambiguous notion of âresistance.â The notion of resistance, however, says little about the nature of that which is being resisted, or of the politics of the resistance involved.
âResistanceâ is rarely based on a reflexive analysis of possibilities for fundamental change that are both generated and suppressed by the dynamic heteronomous order of capital. âResistanceâ is an undialectical category that does not grasp its own conditions of possibility; it fails to grasp the dynamic historical context of capital and its reconstitution of possibilities for both domination and emancipation, of which the âresistersâ do not recognize that that they are a part.â
â Moishe Postone, âHistory and Helplessness: Mass Mobilization and Contemporary Forms of Anticapitalismâ (Public Culturež 18.1: 2006)
Reform, revolution, resistance: what kind of weight do these categories hold for the Left today? How are they used, to where do they point, and what is their history? Join the Platypus Affiliated Society for a discussion concerning a question that has renewed immediacy in light of the #Occupy movement.
Speakers:
1) Nikolas Sevastakis, associate professor at the School of Political Science of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
2) Thodoris Karyotis, member of direct democracy and cooperative movements
3) Aris Tsioumas, member of KEHA (Kinisi Ergatikis Hirafetisis kai Autoorganosis, i.e. Movement for Labour Emancipation and Selforganisation)
4) Costas Gousis, member of NAR, component of the anticapitalist coalition ANTARSYA
University of London Union (ULU), Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX
Room 3B
SPEAKERS:
Clare Solomon
James Heartfield
James Turley
Matt Cole
Moderated by:
Laurie Rojas
â[After the 1960s, the] underlying despair with regard to the real efficacy of political will, of political agency [. . .] in a historical situation of heightened helplessness [. . .] became a self-constitution as outsider, as other [. . .] focused on the bureaucratic stasis of the [Fordist/late 20th Century] world: it echoed the destruction of that world by the dynamics of capital [with the neo-liberal turn after 1973, and especially after 1989].
The idea of a fundamental transformation became bracketed and, instead, was replaced by the more ambiguous notion of âresistance.â The notion of resistance, however, says little about the nature of that which is being resisted or of the politics of the resistance involved â that is, the character of determinate forms of critique, opposition, rebellion, and ârevolution.â The notion of âresistanceâ frequently expresses a deeply dualistic worldview that tends to reify both the system of domination and the idea of agency.
âResistanceâ is rarely based on a reflexive analysis of possibilities for fundamental change that are both generated and suppressed by [the] dynamic heteronomous order
[of capital]. ['Resistance'] is an undialectical category that does not grasp its own conditions of possibility; that is, it fails to grasp the dynamic historical context of which it is a part.â
â Moishe Postone, âHistory and Helplessness: Mass Mobilization and Contemporary Forms of Anticapitalismâ
(Public Culture 18:1, 2006)
1. Since the 1960s, and especially since the 1990s, struggles for social, economic and political emancipation have been conceived less in terms of structural reforms or revolutionary transformation and more in terms of âresistance.â How do you define âresistanceâ and how do you understand its role in possibilities for social change?
2. One powerful way âresistanceâ has been conceived has been in terms of âcultureâ and practices of âeveryday life.â How do you understand the implicit (if not explicit) distinction thus made of politics directed at society as a
whole, from the more apparently mundane concerns and stakes of quotidian existence?
3. What, in your understanding, are the reasons for and the consequences of this historical shift away from movements for reform or revolutionary politics, to tactics, strategies, and self-understandings in terms of âresistance?â
4. Where do the new forms of politics of âresistanceâ point, in your estimation, for social-emancipatory possibilities, today and in the future?
5. What kinds of change do you envision on the horizon of present social concerns? How do you imagine the potential manifestations of such change?
6. What can and should those on the Left â those interested in working towards social emancipation â do, tactically and strategically, in view of such possibilities for change?
Also find us at our Facebook event.
Since 2007 Platypus has been organizing a series of events on The 3Rs. Click on the date/location to go to the audio:
//Chicago, November 2007:
Panelists:
Michael Albert (Z Magazine, author of Parecon: Life After Capitalism), Chris Cutrone (Platypus) [Chris Cutrone's opening remarks prepared text], Stephen Duncombe (Gallatin School of New York University, editor of Cultural Resistance Reader), Brian Holmes (Continental Driftand Université Tangente), and Marisa Holmes (new Students for a Democratic Society).
//Boston, April 2012
Panelists:
Jeff Booth (Socialist Alternative)
Gayge (Common Struggle Libertarian Communist Federation)
Joe Ramsey (Kasama Project)
Laura Lee Schmidt (Platypus)
J. Phil Thompson (MIT)
//New York, April 2012
Panelists:
Todd Gitlin (Columbia University)
Tom Trottier (Workersâ International Committee)
Ross Wolfe (Platypus Affiliated Society)
//Toronto (Canada), March 2012
Panelists:
Clare OâConnor,
Baolinh Dang (Proletarian Revolutionary Action Committee- Revolutionary Students Movement),
Cam Hardy (Platypus),
Megan Kinch (#Occupy, Toronto Media Co-Op), and
Jim Stanford (Canadian Auto Workers).
//Halifax (Canada), January 2012
Panelists:
Eric Anatolik (Occupy NS), Jacques Beaudoin (Parti communiste revolutionnaire â Revolutionary Communist Party, Canada) Howard Epstein (New Democratic Party MLA Halifax Chebucto), Max Haiven (Edu-Factory, Historical and Critical Studies NSCAD) and Andony Melathopoulos (Platypus). The panel was moderated by Pam Nogales.
Sunday, May 20th, Platypus is meeting up at 11 am at Cafe Baci (20 N. Michigan) 1 hour before the beginning of the march to get organized, distribute signs and fliers. We are going to leave Baci at 11:30 to walk over to the rally at Petrillo Band Shell in Grant Park