RSS FeedRSS FeedLivestreamLivestreamVimeoVimeoTwitterTwitterFacebook GroupFacebook Group
You are here: Platypus /The Platypus Review

The Platypus Review

Latest Issue: #122

A FALSE REASSURANCE EXISTS AROUND THE YEAR OF 1917, equally for those who treat its legacy as a model and those who treat it as a question that has yet to be answered. As Rosa Luxemburg put it: the October Revolution posed a question that couldn’t be answered in Russia.
On April 5th, 2019 at the University of Chicago, the Platypus Affiliated Society hosted a conversation, moderated by Pam Nogales, on the legacy of 1989 at its 11th annual international convention. What follows is an edited transcript of the discussion.
Few figures, excepting perhaps Adam Smith,[1] have received such scorn from the Left as has Nietzsche. The philosopher of ice and high mountains has all too assiduously been banished to the depths of rightwing reaction or derided as a brief flirtation only fit for male teenage angst.

Editorial Statement

Taking stock of the universe of positions and goals that constitutes leftist politics today, we are left with the disquieting suspicion that a deep commonality underlies the apparent variety: What exists today is built upon the desiccated remains of what was once possible
[ . . . ]

Submission Guidelines

Articles in the Platypus Review will typically range in length from 750–4,500 words, but longer pieces will also be considered. Please send article submissions and inquiries about the project to: editor@platypus1917.org. All submissions should conform to the Chicago Manual of Style.

Platypus Review Staff

Editor-In-Chief

Erin Hagood

Copy Editors

Houston Small
Rory Hannigan
Louis Sterrett
Will Stratford

Designer

Frederik R. Heinz

Web Editor

Evan Odell

Social Media

Gabby Gottfried
Grady Lowery

Archive

2007

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November (#1)
December