The Russian Revolution, which Lenin held up as the torch-light of emancipation for the world proletariat, is being run into national socialist channels. . . . âThe Russian proletariat,â said Lenin, âcannot single-handed bring the socialist revolution to a victorious conclusion. But it can give the Russian revolution a mighty impetus such as would create most favorable conditions for a socialist revolution, and would, in a sense, start it. It can help to create more favorable circumstances for its most important, most trustworthy and most reliable collaborator, the European and American proletariat, to join the decisive battlesâ (âFarewell letter to the Swiss workers,â 1917).
â âLenin lives in the work of the Oppositionâ (1931)
Boston, Chicago, London, New York, Philadelphia
Click on banners to see lectures in video and audio.
/// Week 1 Lecture /// 1879-1905 /// 6.16.12
/// Week 2 Lecture /// 1905-1917 /// 6.23.12
/// Week 3 Lecture /// 1917-1923 /// 6.30.12
/// Week 4 Lecture /// 1923-1933 /// 7.7.12
/// Week 5 Lecture /// 1933-1940 /// 7.14.12
/// Week 6 Lecture /// 1940-1953 /// 7.21.12
/// Week 7 Lecture /// 1953-1963 /// 7.28.12
Video will be broadcast live and available as recordings at: http://www.livestream.com/platypusaffiliatedsociety
Saturdays 1â4PM CST
School of the Art Institute of Chicago (SAIC)
112 S. Michigan Ave. room 920
Saturdays 2â5PM EST
New School University New York (New School)
Eugene Lang Building
65 W. 11th St. ground floor (enter at 66 W. 12th St.) conference room
/// Recommended preliminary readings
x recommended / + supplemental reading
+ Tariq Ali and Phil Evans, Introducing Trotsky and Marxism / Trotsky for Beginners (1980)
+ Nicolas Krasso, "Trotsky's Marxism" (1967)
x Platypus Historians Group, "The dead Left: Trotskyism" (2008)
x Richard Rubin, "The decline of the Left in the 20th century: 1933" (2009)
x Ian Morrison, "Trotsky's Marxism" (2011)
x Mike Macnair, Bryan Palmer, Richard Rubin, and Jason Wright, "The legacy of Trotskyism" (2011)
x Grover Furr, "Learning from the Communist Movement of the 20th century: A response to Richard Rubin" (2012)
+ Spartacist League, Lenin and the Vanguard Party (1978)
+ Richard Appignanesi and Oscar Zarate / A&Z, Introducing Lenin and the Russian Revolution / Lenin for Beginners (1978)
+ Isaac Deutscher, The Prophet: Trotsky biography (three volumes: 1954, 1959, 1963)
/// Week 1 Readings
/// 1879-1905
x Tariq Ali and Phil Evans, Introducing Trotsky and Marxism / Trotsky for Beginners (1980)
x Leon Trotsky, Results and Prospects (1906)
/// Week 2 Readings
/// 1905-1917
+ Trotsky, 1905 (1907)
x Trotsky, The Lessons of October (1924) [PDF]
/// Week 3 Readings
/// 1917â23
x Trotsky, Terrorism and Communism (1920)
x Trotsky, The Lessons of October (1924) [PDF]
+ Trotsky, Literature and Revolution (1924)
+ Bret Schneider, âTrotskyâs theory of artâ (2011)
/// Week 4 Readings
/// 1923â33
+ Trotsky, Where is Britain Going? (1925)
+ Trotsky, Problems of the Chinese Revolution 1927â31 (1932)
+ Trotsky, writings on the rise of Hitler and the destruction of the German Left (1930â40), especially âTo build communist parties and an international anewâ (1933)
/// Week 5 Readings
/// 1933â40
x Trotsky, âStalinism and Bolshevismâ (1937)
x Trotsky, The Death Agony of Capitalism and the Tasks of the Fourth International (1938)
+ Trotsky, âTrade unions in the epoch of imperialist decayâ (1940)
+ Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed (1936)
+ Trotsky, In Defense of Marxism (1939/40), especially âLetter to James Cannonâ (September 12, 1939)
+ Trotsky, âArt and politics on our epochâ (1938)
+ Mary McCarthy, âMy Confessionâ (1954)
/// Week 6 Readings
/// 1940â53
+ James Cannon, âThe coming American revolutionâ (1946)
+ C.L.R. James, Raya Dunayevskaya, et al., âProgram of the minority tendency of the Workers Party/U.S.â (1946)
+ C.L.R. James, âDialectical materialism and the fate of humanityâ (1947)
+ Herbert Marcuse, â33 Thesesâ (1947)
+ Earl Browder and Max Shachtman with C. Wright Mills, âIs Russia a socialist community?â (1950)
+ Ernest Mandel, âThe theory of âstate capitalismââ (1951)
+ Michel Pablo, âOn the duration and the nature of the period of transition from capitalism to socialismâ (1951)
+ Pablo, âWhere are we going?â (1953)
/// Week 7 Readings
/// 1953â63
+ Cornelius Castoriadis, âThe workers and organizationâ (1959)
x Cliff Slaughter, âWhat is revolutionary leadership?â (1960)
x Revolutionary Tendency of the Socialist Workers Party/U.S., âIn defense of a revolutionary perspectiveâ (1962)
+ Tony Cliff, âThe coming Russian revolutionâ (final chapter of Russia: A Marxist Analysis, 1964)
+ Hal Draper, âThe two souls of socialismâ (1966)
+ Isaac Deutscher, âMarxism in our timeâ (1965)
+ Murray Bookchin, âListen, Marxist!â (1969)
x Spartacist League, âGenesis of Pabloismâ (1972)
Richard Rubin
Lecture 2:
1905-1917
Part of the Summer 2012 Platypus Affiliated Society Primary Reading Group Lecture Series: Trotsky and Trotskyism
Recorded on 6.23.12
The New School
âą recommended / + supplemental reading
Recommended preliminary readings:
Week 2 Readings:
+ Trotsky, 1905 (1907)
âą Trotsky, The Lessons of October (1924) [PDF]
Please Note: Due to technical problems, the video recording glitches after ~32:00. The audio recording is without glitches, however.
A roundtable on the Quebec Left following the student strike / Une table ronde sur l'avenir de la Gauche québecoise à la lumiÚre de la grÚve étudiante
Hosted by the Platypus Affiliated Society / Présenté par la Platypus Affiliated Society
June 18, 2012 / Lundi, 18 heures / le 18 juin 2012
QPIRG McGill
Participants:
Matthew Brett (Canadian Dimension magazine editorial collective, Secretary for the Society for Socialist Studies, Concordia University)
Jamie Burnett (McGill student activist)
Brad Fougere (International Workers of the World (IWW) / Midnight Kitchen)
Coralie Jean (Mouvement Ătudiant RĂ©volutionnaire (MER-PCR))
Molly Swain (Gender, Sexuality Diversity, and Feminist Studies Student Association, McGill)
Moderator:
Andony Melathopoulos (Platypus)
Description: While it is clear that the student strike in Quebec expresses more than just discontent against tuition fee hikes, itâs less clear if there is general agreement among strikers on what follows the strike. For many the strike is about resisting neo-liberalism and its assault on the "modĂšle quĂ©bĂ©cois", the system of labour legislation, educational reform and public welfare that emerged from the 1960s Quiet Revolution. But for others the strike signals a possibility to go beyond the past. This is has been expressed as a desire to pick up where the 1970s social democracy left off through demands such as free tuition. Others view Quebec's social democratic past as being part of the problem. They judge that parliamentary approaches have grown irrelevant in the face of a direct democracy that has carried the strike through five months in spite of massive police reaction.
The Platypus Affiliated Society is hosting this roundtable to explore these different political visions for the future of the Quebec Left. We encourage political disagreement among participants in the spirit of clarifying the potential directions and further development of the student movement. We assert that only when we are able create an active culture of thinking and debating on the Left without it proving prematurely divisive can we begin to imagine a Leftist politics adequate to the historical possibilities of our moment. We may not know what these possibilities for transformation are. This is why we think it is imperative to create avenues of engagement that will support these efforts
Déscription: Bien qu'il soit évident que la grÚve étudiante au Québec exprime plus qu'un simple mécontentement face à la hausse des frais de scolarité, il est moins évident de discerner une position commune parmi les grévistes par rapport à ce qui suivra la grÚve. Plusieurs voient la grÚve comme étant une forme de résistance contre le néo-libéralisme et l'assaut que celui-ci exerce sur le "modÚle québécois": le systÚme de la législation du travail, de réforme éducative et de sécurité sociale établie lors de la Révolution tranquille des années 60. Mais pour d'autres, la grÚve signale la possibilité d'aller au delà du passé. Ce point de vue a été exprimé par le désir de prendre la relÚve de la démocratie sociale des années 70 à travers des demandes comme celle de l'abolition totale des frais de scolarité. Encore d'autres grévistes voient le passé social-démocrate du Québec comme faisant partie du problÚme. Ceux-ci jugent que l'approche parlementaire est devenue désuÚte face à une démocratie directe qui a porté la grÚve pendant 5 mois, en dépit d'une massive réaction policiÚre.
La Platypus Affiliated Society prĂ©sente cette table ronde dans le but d'explorer ces diffĂ©rentes visions politiques de l'avenir de la Gauche quĂ©bĂ©coise. Nous encourageons le dĂ©saccord politique parmi les participants, dans l'esprit de pouvoir clarifier les directions et dĂ©veloppements possibles au sein du mouvement Ă©tudiant. Nous affirmons que nous ne pourrions imaginer une politique de gauche, adĂ©quate aux possibilitĂ©s historiques de notre moment, que lors d'avoir crĂ©Ă© une culture de dĂ©bat et de pensĂ©e active au sein de la Gauche elle-mĂȘme. Il se peut que nous n'avons pas encore pris conscience de ces possibilitĂ©s de transformation. Voici pourquoi nous croyons en l'impĂ©ratif de crĂ©er des forums de dĂ©libĂ©ration qui soutiendront ces efforts de prise de conscience.
Richard Rubin
Lecture 1: Overview of Trotskyism and its significance for Platypus
1879-1905
Part of the Summer 2012 Platypus Affiliated Society Primary Reading Group Lecture Series: Trotsky and Trotskyism
Recorded on 6.16.12
The New School
âą recommended / + supplemental reading
Week 1 Readings:
âą Tariq Ali and Phil Evans, Introducing Trotsky and Marxism / Trotsky for Beginners (1980)
âą Leon Trotsky, Results and Prospects (1906)
A panel discussion with audience Q & A on the problematic forms of "anticapitalism" today.
Held on Wednesday 13th June, 7pm at the University of London Union (ULU), Malet Street, London.
SPEAKERS:
Clare Solomon (co-editor of Springtime: The New Student Rebellions (2011); President of the University Of London Union in 2010)
James Heartfield (active in extra-parliamentary Left for thirty years; author of The 'Death of the Subject" Explained (2002), and the forthcoming Unpatriotic History of the Second World War (2012)).
James Turley (member of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) for five years, and a regular writer for the Weekly Worker; co-editor and contributer to Red Mist, a blog of Marxist cultural commentary)
Matt Cole (organizer, researcher, editor, writer, Rousseauist; Kingston University)
Moderated by:
Laurie Rojas (founding member of the Platypus Affiliated Society, editor of the Platypus Review).
---
"[After the 1960s, the] underlying despair with regard to the real efficacy of political will, of political agency [. . .] in a historical situation of heightened helplessness [. . .] became a self-constitution as outsider, as other [. . .] focused on the bureaucratic stasis of the [Fordist/late 20th Century] world: it echoed the destruction of that world by the dynamics of capital [with the neo-liberal turn after 1973, and especially after 1989].
The idea of a fundamental transformation became bracketed and, instead, was replaced by the more ambiguous notion of Ăąresistance.Ăą The notion of resistance, however, says little about the nature of that which is being resisted or of the politics of the resistance involved Ăą that is, the character of determinate forms of critique, opposition, rebellion, and Ăąrevolution.Ăą The notion of 'resistance' frequently expresses a deeply dualistic worldview that tends to reify both the system of domination and the idea of agency.
'Resistance' is rarely based on a reflexive analysis of possibilities for fundamental change that are both generated and suppressed by [the] dynamic heteronomous order [of capital]. ['Resistance'] is an undialectical category that does not grasp its own conditions of possibility; that is, it fails to grasp the dynamic historical context of which it is a part."
- Moishe Postone, "History and Helplessness: Mass Mobilization and Contemporary Forms of Anticapitalism"
(Public Culture 18:1, 2006)
1. Since the 1960s, and especially since the 1990s, struggles for social, economic and political emancipation have been conceived less in terms of structural reforms or revolutionary transformation and more in terms of "resistance." How do you define ĂąresistanceĂą and how do you understand its role in possibilities for social change?
2. One powerful way "resistance" has been conceived has been in terms of "culture" and practices of Ăąeveryday life.Ăą How do you understand the implicit (if not explicit) distinction thus made of politics directed at society as a whole, from the more apparently mundane concerns and stakes of quotidian existence?
3. What, in your understanding, are the reasons for and the consequences of this historical shift away from movements for reform or revolutionary politics, to tactics, strategies, and self-understandings in terms of "resistance?"
4. Where do the new forms of politics of ĂąresistanceĂą point, in your estimation, for social-emancipatory possibilities, today and in the future?
5. What kinds of change do you envision on the horizon of present social concerns? How do you imagine the potential manifestations of such change?
6. What can and should those on the Left and those interested in working towards social emancipation do, tactically and strategically, in view of such possibilities for change?