On October 24, 2018, the Platypus Affiliated Society hosted a discussion on 50 years of 1968 at Berkeley City Community College. The discussion was moderated by Audrey Crescenti.
Description:
For half a century, 1968 has represented a high-water mark of social and political transformation, a year of social upheaval that spanned the entire globe. Ushered in by a New Left that sought to distinguish itself from the Old Left that emerged in the 1920s and â30s, the monumental events of 1968 set the tone for everything from protest politics to academic leftism.
Today, with the U.S. entangled in a seemingly endless war in Asia and people calling for the impeachment of an unpopular president, with activists fighting in the streets and calling for liberation along the lines of race, gender, and sexuality, the Leftâs every attempt to discover new methods and new ideas seems to invoke a memory of the political horizons of 1968. We can perhaps more than ever feel the urgency of the question, What lessons are to be drawn from the New Left, as another generation undertakes the project of building a left for the 21st century?
Panelists:
- Bobby Seale (Black Panther Party)
- Max Elbaum (Students for a Democratic Society)
- Watson Ladd (Platypus Affiliated Society)
Held October 4, 2018 at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Panelists:
John Abbott, Senior lecturer of history at UIC
John Bachtell, Chairman of the Communist Party USA
Fred Mecklenburg, News and Letters
David Faes, Platypus / Campaign for a Socialist Party
Panel Description:
The term âsocialismâ appears to be enjoying a resurgence of public interest - both favorably where it is self-prescribed and pejoratively where it is meant to degrade the respectability of public figures. From early 2016 at the height of Bernie Sanders's campaign for the Democratic Party nomination to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezâs victory over Joe Crowley in June, the term âsocialismâ appears to be gaining some level of purchase and a whole lot of press. In many instances, âsocialismâ is commingled with terms as varied as âsocial democraticâ, âcommunistâ, âmarxistâ, âanarchistâ, etc. As such, we view this is as an opportune moment to ask, âwhat is socialism after all?â What do public figures mean when they identify as socialists or any one of its varied strains? What do their opponents think it means? What does it mean and what can it mean? And perhaps, most important of all, what did it mean in the past?
Held September 27, 2018 at Oregon State University. Moderated by Andony Melathopoulos.
Speakers (in order):
- Mika Goodwin - Democratic Socialists of America (Corvallis)
- Paige Kreisman - Communist Party of Oregon (CPUSA)
- Douglas Lain - publishing manager Zero Books, author of Bash Bash Revolution
- Christopher Nichols - History Department, OSU, author of Promise and Peril: America at the Dawn of a Global Age
Panel Description:
The term âsocialismâ appears to be enjoying a resurgence of public interest - both favorably where it is self-prescribed and pejoratively where it is meant to degrade the respectability of public figures. From early 2016 at the height of Bernie Sanders's campaign for the Democratic Party nomination to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezâs victory over Joe Crowley in June, the term âsocialismâ appears to be gaining some level of purchase and a whole lot of press. In many instances, âsocialismâ is commingled with terms as varied as âsocial democraticâ, âcommunistâ, âmarxistâ, âanarchistâ, etc. As such, we view this is as an opportune moment to ask, âwhat is socialism after all?â What do public figures mean when they identify as socialists or any one of its varied strains? What do their opponents think it means? What does it mean and what can it mean? And perhaps, most important of all, what did it mean in the past?
In den letzten Jahren haben sich viele linke Aktivisten und Theoretiker mit der Wohnungsfrage, der damit zusammenhĂ€ngenden VerĂ€nderung der StĂ€dte und den steigenden Mieten auseinandergesetzt. Ein GroĂteil der AktivitĂ€t richtet sich gegen Gentrifizierung und versucht bestehende politische Parteien dazu zu bewegen, in Sozialenwohnungsbau zu investieren und die Mietsteigerungen zu bremsen.
Seit Friedrich Engels in den 1840ern die Lebens- und Wohnbedingungen der englischen Arbeiterklasse untersucht hat, haben politische VerĂ€nderungen im Kapitalismus zu unterschiedlichen Formen von staatlicher Wohnungspolitik gefĂŒhrt. Dennoch bleibt die Wohnungskrise im Kapitalismus ungelöst.
Wie sind die politischen KĂ€mpfe der Vergangenheit und Gegenwart - fĂŒr bessere Wohnungen und eine gerechtere Stadtplanung, gegen Neoliberalismus und Gentrifizierung â einzuordnen? Wie könnten sie heute den Kampf fĂŒr Sozialismus und das Streben nach Freiheit vorantreiben?
Mietentscheid Frankfurt - Andreas Schindel
Exit - Herbert Böttcher
Solidarisches Gallus - Ivo Eichhorn
Interventionistische Linke (IL) - Rolf Engelke
Held on September 8, 2018 at New York University. Moderated by Wentai Xiao.
Panelists:
- A.M. Gittlitz, contributor to the New Inquiry and co-host of the Antifada Podcast
- John Garvey, Editor of Insurgent Notes
- Richard Wolin, Professor of History at the CUNY Graduate Center
Description:
The term âsocialismâ appears to be enjoying a resurgence of public interest - both favorably where it is self-prescribed and pejoratively where it is meant to degrade the respectability of public figures. From early 2016 at the height of Bernie Sanders's campaign for the Democratic Party nomination to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezâs victory over Joe Crowley in June, the term âsocialismâ appears to be gaining some level of purchase and a whole lot of press. In many instances, âsocialismâ is commingled with terms as varied as âsocial democraticâ, âcommunistâ, âmarxistâ, âanarchistâ, etc. As such, we view this is as an opportune moment to ask, âwhat is socialism after all?â What do public figures mean when they identify as socialists or any one of its varied strains? What do their opponents think it means? What does it mean and what can it mean? And perhaps, most important of all, what did it mean in the past?