RSS FeedRSS FeedLivestreamLivestreamVimeoVimeoTwitterTwitterFacebook GroupFacebook Group
You are here: Platypus /Archive for tag Platypus

Dienstags 20:00 - 22:00 UhrRaum S1|03-12 (Altes Hauptgebäude, Hochschulstr.1)

Kontakt: Nicolas.Schliessler(ät)


Mit Ausnahme der ersten und vierten Sitzung und des englischen Transkripts der "Reform, Revolution, Resistance"-Podiusmdiskussion in der dritten Sitzung, sind alle Texte im Platypus-Reader zu finden. Es gibt genügend Druckexemplare des Readers für alle TeilnehmerInnen, dieser ist jedoch auch online als PDF- Version hier zu finden:


1.Sitzung: Dienstag, 02. Dezember


2.Sitzung: Dienstag, 09. Dezember

  • Mission, Was ist ein Schnabeltier?, Eine kurze Geschichte der Linken, Mission der Platypus Review
  • Cutrone, Chris: Das Kapital in der Geschichte


3.Sitzung: Dienstag, 16. Dezember



4.Sitzung: Dienstag, 13. Januar


5.Sitzung: Dienstag, 20. Januar

Platypus Frankfurt lädt zum Ferienlesekreis über "Kunst und Politik".

Ort: Studierendenhaus Bockenheim, K3
Zeit: Immer Freitags 15-18 Uhr
Erster Termin: 29.08.2014



Vorausgesetzte Lektüre:

• Chris Cutrone et al., “The relevance of Critical Theory to art today” (2011)
Woche 1. Die Bedeutung von Kunst | 29. August 2014

• Susan Buck-Morss, Antworten zum Visual culture questionnaire (1996)

• Immanuel Kant, Vorwort und Einleitung zur Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790)

Woche 2. Moderne Ästhetik der Kunst | 5. September 2014

• G.W.F. Hegel, Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, Erster Abschnitt:
"Einleitung" bis (inklusive) "3. Zweck der Kunst"über%20die%20Ästhethik%20I%20-%20OCRed.pdf

Woche 3. Kunst und Politik in unserer Epoche | 12. September 2014

• Leon Trotzki, "Kunst und Revolution" (1938)

• Clement Greenberg, "Avant-garde and kitsch" (1939)

Woche 4. Revolutionäre Kunst? | 19. September

• Walter Benjamin, "Erfahrung und Armut" (1934)

• Benjamin, "Der Autor als Produzent" (1934)

• Jürgen Habermas, "Die Moderne - ein unvollendest Projekt" (1981)

Woche 5. Kunst und Warenform | 26. September

• Stewart Martin, “Critique of relational aesthetics” (2007)
(bald verfügbar)

• Stewart Martin, “The absolute artwork meets the absolute commodity” (2007)

• Theodor Adorno, Ästhetische Theorie (1970):
Selbstverständlichkeit von Kunst verloren (S. 9 - 11)
Gesellschaft (S. 334 - 389)
(bald verfügbar)

A panel event held at the Inaugural European Conference of the Platypus Affiliated Society on July 18th, 2014 at Goldsmiths College, London.

At this panel event, Platypus members Lucy Parker (London); Jan Schroeder (Frankfurt); and Nikos Manousakis (Thessaloniki) reflected upon the below questions. This was followed by an open audience Q&A.

What have been some of the more significant engagements in your chapter with the Left? Why was this important for the development of your chapter and, what has this engagement taught us about the nature international Left?

What are some challenges in building your local chapter, what is the landscape of the Left that makes it hard to navigate, etc?

Why Platypus? Why does platypus need to exist in your location aside from you being there?What are the recurring points of discussions within your chapter? Do you feel like your chapter differs from the international discussions if so how?

This is an international conference, in what way do you see yourself as part of an international organization and how do you see Platypus as an international project? What do you see as the growing trends in the Left in the next year or two? How might Platypus be positioned to address these? Should it?

Where do you want Platypus to go? What other kind of engagements do you hope to foster in the future with the help of other international chapters?

Every year at the Platypus International Convention, speakers from various perspectives are asked to bring their experience of the Left’s recent history to bear on today’s political possibilities and challenges as part of the “Differing Perspectives on the Left” workshop series.

A workshop with the Democratic Socialists of America (Joseph Schwartz (Temple University) and Bill Barclay) held on April 5, 2014, at the Sixth Platypus International Convention.

Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts bemerkten Marx und Engels in einer berühmten Formulierung: "Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa - das Gespenst des Kommunismus." 160 Jahre später scheint der Marxismus selbst zu einem Gespenst geworden zu sein.

Es scheint, als hätte die Linke im 21. Jahrhundert den Marxismus als möglichen Weg zur Freiheit aufgegeben. Doch griff Marx vor allem in seiner eigenen Zeit ein, um seine Zeitgefährten zu ermuntern, die Gesellschaft zu verändern. Trägt die Linke diese Verantwortung heute wohl nicht mehr? Hat die Linke gar die Problematiken, die Marx aufwarf, beantwortet und ist fortgeschritten?

Ist der Marxismus überhaupt noch relevant?

A panel event held at New York University on April 18th, 2013.

Transcripted in Platypus Review #57 (Click on banner to see):
theprweb1 (16)

Recently, a series of exchanges between the Communist Party of Great Britain (PCC), the International Bolshevik Tendency, and the Platypus Affiliated Society has unfolded, mapping a field of positions and historical perspectives whose contours trace some of the most provocative contemporary perspectives on Marxism, socialism, and democracy.

With this public forum speakers will take stock of the points of convergence and divergence that have emerged in order to push the conversation further on key issues such as Left unity, neo-Kautskyism, factionalism, Trotskyism, sectarianism, Leninism and Bolshevism, democratic organization and political program. The event will feature:

James Turley (CPGB)
Bhaskar Sunkara (Jacobin)
Benjamin Blumberg (Platypus)

Please see the link below for a helpful compilation of debates between the Communist Party of Great Britain (PCC), the International Bolshevik Tendency, and the Platypus Affiliated Society.

The full compilation may be found here.

A panel held on April 6, 2013, at the 2013 Platypus International Convention at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.

Transcribed in Platypus Review #59 (Click below to see):


Ten years on from the US invasion of Iraq, are we any closer to understanding what Imperialism is and why we are against it? The problem of Imperialism seems to be getting more difficult to clarify, in relation to our present moment. Since the euphoria around the Arab Spring has passed, the Left has had mixed responses to the interventionist foreign policy of the US, UK and France in the Middle East and North Africa.

It is difficult to disentangle and to clarify what relation the Left’s responses to current issues in Libya, Mali and Syria bear to the history of anti-Imperialism. Never-the-less, if we are to ever overcome Imperialism, we must also confront the history of the Left’s attempts to overcome it.

Just over thirty years ago, the Falklands war presented problems for the Left, in terms of being, on the one hand, against imperialism of British intervention, on the other hand, against a brutal military dictatorship in Argentina. Anti-fascism and anti-imperialism have not always been in ideological conflict on the Left. But, it could be argued, that they have increasingly become so. If this is the case, it might suggest a changing character of anti-Imperialism during the history of the 20th Century. Looking further back, to WW1, what did Marxists understand by the term Imperialism? Does being anti-Imperialist, today even mean to be anti-Capitalist? Does being anti-Capitalist, mean to be anti-Imperialist?

In asking ‘What is Imperialism and for what reasons are you against it?’ this panel is also attempting to address ‘What does it mean to be Marxist, and what does it mean to be on the Left, today?’ It is also to ask, what has become of the Left, and conversely, what could it become?


Larry Everest (Revolutionary Communist Party)
Joseph Green (Communist Voice)
James Turley (Communist Party of Great Britain)

"Why I joined Platypus" was the Sunday Plenary panel at the Platypus Affiliated Society's 4th Annual International Convention, held at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, March 30 to April 1, 2012. In this panel four members reflect on why they joined Platypus, and what this decision has meant for them. This panel took place on April 1st, 2012, at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.

Chris Cutrone
Thodoris Velissaris
Benjamin Landau-Beispiel
Douglas La Rocca

Panel held on March 31st, 2012 at the Fourth Annual Platypus International Convention, School of the Art Institute of Chicago.

The two decades of the 1990s-2000s form a cycle containing certain common as well as differing concerns. The second decade of the 21st century has begun under the mixed legacy of recent history, presenting important problems needing to be worked through, moving forward.

For Platypus's 2012 international convention, two plenary panels will ask speakers from various perspectives to bring their experience of the Left"s recent history to bear on today's political possibilities and challenges.

The '90s Left Today

After the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and collapse of the Soviet Union soon after, a new political era opened, in which Marxism was discredited and anarchism became predominant on the radical Left. The most pressing challenges of post-Cold War neo-liberal globalization came amid an era of prosperity at the supposed "end of history." Postmodernist disenchantment with "grand narratives" of emancipation meant a turn against "ideology." Social "justice" rather than freedom became the watchword for a better world. "Resistance" and "horizontal" or "rhizomatic" politics provided a model for "changing the world without taking power" (as John Holloway, inspired by the Zapatistas, put it). Information technology -- the rise of the internet -- matched the new cosmopolitanism. The global order of "empire" confronted by the "multitude" demanded access to the "commonwealth" (Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri). The "death of communism" challenged the Left's imagination of an emancipated future. "Black bloc" protest and "communisation" theory replaced traditional socialism, as the 20th century came to an uncertain close.

The '00s Left Today

As a result of the 9/11 attacks, the War on Terror rekindled anti-imperialist protest, even while it seemed to deliver a grave blow to the newly emergent World Social Forum, "alterglobalisation" movement. Neo-conservatism in the U.S. presented the specter of growing divisions in the global order, to which the world's most vulnerable might fall victim. Religious fundamentalism appeared to surge. Disenchantment with capitalist development accompanied the social imagination of ecological crisis and economic downturn: the desire for a "green economy" and apparent need for decreased consumption. At the same time, new intensification of global migration of workers presented challenges for political integration. The U.S. and allied wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and beyond, were met by an anti-war movement and a new generation of radicalization. But the wars were eclipsed by financial crisis and Obamaâs election, bringing anti-austerity protests (setting the stage later for #Occupy), as the first decade of the 21st century ended with the economic crisis lingering and even deepening, scotching hopes for a reversal of neoliberalism and return to "Keynesian" social investment policies. Neoliberalism and neoconservatism both stood discredited, but without presenting a clear alternative for the future.

Daniel Dulce (Crimthinc)
Thodoris Velissaris (Platypus)
Nick Kreitman (Platypus, Formerly new SDS)
Mike Ely (Kasama)
Joshua Moufawad-Paul (Supporter, Parti communiste revolutionnaire - Revolutionary Communist Party (Canada)

Radikaler Anarchismus, Schwulenrechtsbewegung, Anti-Vietnam-Kriegs-Mobilisierung – vor einigen Jahrzehnten war die radikale Linke in den USA ein Impulsgeber für weltweite soziale Bewegungen. Doch nicht erst seit dem 11. September und Obama ist es um die Situation der Linken schlecht bestellt. Neben geringer Beteiligung und mangelndem Einfluss sind es dabei auch innerlinke Fehler, die das Projekt der Emanzipation behindern: Aktionismus, staatsappellative Kampagnen, kruder Antiimperialismus und Forderungen nach systemimmanenten Reformen sind dominant in linken Bewegungen, eine umfassende Kritik an der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, an Kapital und Nation, finden sich hingegen selten.

Im kosmopolitischen Kamingespräch wollen wir einen Überblick über den gegenwärtigen Zustand der radikalen Linken in den USA bieten, ihn historisch einbetten, und den Versuch einer Organisation dokumentieren, die der gegenwärtigen Misere etwas entgegensetzen will. Dabei sollen auch das Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis, Reaktionen auf die Finanzkrise und das bisherige Ausbleiben der ‚wirklichen Bewegung‘ zur Sprache kommen.

Die »Platypus Affiliated Society« gründete sich 2006 als Reaktion auf die Niederlage der Anti-Irakkrieg-Bewegung. Ihr Hauptanliegen ist es innerlinke Diskussionen anzustoßen. Ausgehend von Marx und der Kritischen Theorie will die Organisation ideologische Hindernisse für die Entstehung einer kosmopolitischen Linken aus dem Weg räumen.

(Die Veranstaltung findet auf englisch statt)

MONARCH • U-Bhf Kottbusser Tor • Skalitzer Straße 134 • Berlin-Kreuzberg
In Zusammenarbeit mit TOP-Berlin