AT THE PLATYPUS European Conference, I suggested that there is a modern theory of crisis that is no longer fit for purpose. It belongs to modern political theory in general. It is not exclusively Marxist. You’ll find it in Lenin and Adorno, but also in Jürgen Habermas and Reinhart Koselleck. Indeed, you’ll even find it in Robert Dahl, if you know where to look.

I IDENTIFY STRONGLY WITH the wrongly accused. So does America more broadly. And Trump has been wrongly accused. If you are in the right, then there is no need to lie. And they have lied about Trump.

LENIN’S LEGACY TODAY is an accursed share. Lenin is a specter haunting us after a century which has failed to fundamentally transcend the terms he set for revolutionary politics. The philosopher Theodor Adorno described this historical situation as one wherein “Philosophy, which once seemed outmoded, remains alive because the moment of its realization was missed.” The work of Adorno can be understood as reflecting on that missed moment for the realization of philosophy, which had been heralded by Karl Marx in 1844 as the proletarian revolution, and which the communist militant Karl Korsch had announced Lenin as symbolizing in 1923.

THE EXPRESSION “IDENTITY POLITICS” refers to a tendency among individuals who belong to a particular social group (religion, race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, etc.) to build exclusive political alliances with members of the same social group, especially as a way of rectifying historical injustices. While identity-based movements do have the potential to raise awareness and rectify historical injustices, they can also be co-opted to reinforce systems of hierarchy.

In der Entwicklung der gesellschaftlichen Produktion haben sich, beginnend mit der industriellen Revolution, zwei widersprüchliche Tendenzen herausgebildet: einerseits die zunehmende Automatisierung, wodurch die gesellschaftlich notwendige Arbeitszeit verringert wird; andererseits die Verzweiflung der Menschen aufgrund ihres Überflüssigwerdens als Arbeiter.

Ein Gespräch mit Thomas von der Osten-Sacken über das Verhältnis von bürgerlicher und sozialistischer Revolution und die Bedeutung des marxistischen Imperialismus-Begriffs heute. Thomas von der Osten-Sacken ist Journalist und hat für Konkret, Jungle World und Welt geschrieben.