Workshop with Jack Ross, (author of The Socialist Party of America: A Complete History), held on Saturday 2nd April 2016, at the Platypus International Convention.
Workshop on Trans Liberation, held at the Platypus Affiliated Society international convention 2016, by Xavier Danae Maatra, Saturday 2nd April 2016
Meeting Mondays, 6pm
Goldsmiths College, Richard Hoggart Building, Room 257
⢠required / + recommended reading
Marx readings pp. from Robert C. Tucker, ed., Marx-Engels Reader (Norton 2nd ed., 1978)
Recommended background readings
+ Edmund Wilson, To the Finland Station: A Study in the Writing and Acting of History (1940), Part II. Ch. 12â16 (from "Marx and Engels go back to writing history" to "Karl Marx dies at his desk")
+ James Joll, The Second International 1889â1914 (1966)
Week 1:Â 20th June
+ Karl Korsch, "The Marxism of the First International" (1924)
⢠Karl Marx, Inaugural address to the First International (1864), pp. 512â519
⢠Ferdinand Lassalle, Open letter to the German workersâ movement (1863)
⢠Mikhail Bakunin, A Critique of the German Social-Democratic Program (1870)
⢠Bakunin, Marxism, Freedom and the State (1872)
Week 2: 27th June
+ Korsch, Introduction to Marx, Critique of the Gotha Programme (1922)
⢠Marx, Critique of the Gotha Programme, pp. 525â541
⢠Marx, Programme of the Parti Ouvrier (1880)
⢠Karl Kautsky, The Class Struggle (1892)
Week 3: 4th July
⢠Kautsky,The Social Revolution (1902)
Week 4: 11th July
⢠Peter Kropotkin, The Conquest of Bread, especially Chapters 3, 11 and 12 (1906)
⢠Kropotkin, Anarchist Communism (1909)
Week 5: 18th July
⢠Kautsky, The Road to Power (1909)
Panelists (in order of presentations):
Neil Davenport - Institute of Ideas / Spiked
Mike Macnair - Communist Party of Great Britain / Weekly Worker
Gerry Downing - Socialist Fight
Panel Description:
A united and peaceful Europe seemed to be a distant dream for a generation which went through the experience of war and destruction. In the latter part of the 20th century, this hope gained shape in the new realities of the European Union. Despite its official proclamation of peace, social well being and an âalternative to capitalism and communismâ, today the project finds itself in a prolonged crisis with uncertain expectations. The refugee crisis, the Euro-crisis, massive austerity and the increasing interference into democratic principles, a growing division between powerful and weak economies, and Germany's new hegemony appear in stark contrast to the official slogans of âEuropean values and solidarityâ. The desperate struggle of SYRIZA demonstrated the necessity and seeming impossibility of the Left across Europe to answer with a politics that would be truly international and go beyond âresisting austerity.âDespite growing social unrest, the deep ambivalence towards the EU expresses itself in the inability of the Left to formulate a coherent vision of a political alternative. Should it be overcome on the basis of the EU itself, or against the EU? The clarification of its nature and appropriate responses seem to be one of the most pressing issues for the Left on the continent and beyond.
Questions:
1. The EU ideologically relies on defining itself as a project of pacifism (peace in Europe) and a âthird wayâ politics of a âsocial market economyâ. What do you make of these claims? Should the Left be fighting for the fulfillment of the promise of the EU? How would you characterize the evolution and realization of the EU project in light of its foundational claims?
2. How can the project of the EU be described in political and economic terms? Is it an âimperialistâ project? If so, who are the âImperialistsâ? Is the EU a âneoliberalâ project? If so, to what end? What do these terms clarify? What would an anti-neoliberal or anti-imperialist politics entail?
3. What are the driving forces behind the EU and what are the implications for a Left politics in Europe? Can the EU be âpushed to the Leftâ or is it a project against the Left?
4. Today, the Leftâs response to the Euro-crisis has mostly confined itself to nation states. Yet, the EU represents a âtransnationalâ project. How does this affect the nature of internationalism for the Left? Is this an opportunity yet to be realized, or does the EU represent an obstacle to a true international?
5. SYRIZA was seen as an indicator of shifting political and economic forces in the EU, yet the Left in stronger economies has remained weak. What did its election reveal? What has the Brexit question revealed about the European Left and its tasks? How do both of these affect the dynamic of the EU and how do they task the greater Left?
