RSS FeedRSS FeedLivestreamLivestreamVimeoVimeoTwitterTwitterFacebook GroupFacebook Group
You are here: Platypus /Women’s March: An Islamophile intervention against women’s rights

Women’s March: An Islamophile intervention against women’s rights

Tina Sanders

Platypus Review 104 | March 2018

“WE CAN DISAGREE AND STILL LOVE EACH OTHER, unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist,” Linda Sarsour proudly announces on her Twitter account.[1] Sarsour is a self-proclaimed human rights activist and supporter of the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. She and her Women’s March (WM) colleagues were named Women of The Year 2017 by Glamour magazine.[2] However, for Sarsour, Trump’s so-called “white supremacy” seems to be the only phenomenon deserving of the term “oppression.” When it comes to the 2017–18 Iranian protests, the only critique Sarsour utters is one of Trump’s “Muslim ban.” Sarsour makes no statement calling out the misogynistic, anti-Semitic, in short, Islamist Iranian regime. Sarsour’s very engagement in the debate over the Iran protests—a debate over the emancipation of women and LGBTIQs—seems to have been motivated exclusively by the criticism she and her fellow Women’s March organizer, Tamika D. Mallory, received for their silence from Liz Wheeler, an anchor for the pro-Trump One America News Network.[3] Indeed, to this day Sarsour has given no sign of authentic solidarity with the revolts in Iran.

Love for Louis

On January 27, 2017 the Women’s March activists remembered the Jewish, but also all the other, victims of the Holocaust on their official Twitter page: “On #HolocaustMemorialDay, we remember the six million Jews murdered and the millions of people with disabilities, European Roma and LGBTQIA+ people murdered. On #HolocaustMemorialDay, we recommit ourselves to fighting white supremacy, anti-Semitism and hatred in all its forms.”[4] Sarsour trivializes the unprecedented industrial murder of six million Jews when she retweets comments like this one: “Black people in America are one of the only groups of people on this planet asked to simply get over/forget about their holocaust.”[5] She also repeatedly tries to deflect from the fact that she and her Women’s March colleagues have personal, political, and financial ties to people whose anti-Semitism takes the shape of a wish for the extinction of Jews and the Jewish state—people like Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam.

On November 21, 2016, Carmen Perez, one of the Women’s March organizers, shared a picture of herself and Farrakhan on Instagram. The caption read: “There are many times when I sit with elders or inspirational individuals where I think, I just wish I could package this and share this moment with others. Today, we had the opportunity to share our time with the (Minister Louis Farrakhan).”[6] Tamika D. Mallory wished Farrakhan a Happy Birthday and praised him on the same social media site.[7] In a series of lectures organized by the Nation of Islam, Farrakhan called Jews “satanic” more than once.[8] His 2015 Savior’s Day speech at Mosque Maryam in Chicago included conspiracy theories on how Jews supposedly control the U.S. government and on the cooperation of the U.S. and Israel during the 9/11 attacks.[9] For years, Farrakhan has been promoting the second volume of a Nation of Islam book series which is called “How Jews Gained Control of the Black American Economy” and he propagates the anti-Semitic tale of the involvement of greedy Jews in the American enslavement of African-Americans and black Africans.[10] In a radio interview from May 9, 2017, Farrakhan threatened Jewish Israelis with not being able to stay in their home country for much longer and called on the Iranian and other Islamist regimes to offer resistance against Israel’s existence.[11]

Islamic Relief

On its website, the Women’s March encourages supporters to donate to the organization Islamic Relief (IR) and claims that the money will be spent on helping Syrian refugees.[12] Although it has been deemed a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates, IR has received millions of dollars in donations from the U.S., German, Swedish, and British governments as well as from the UN and EU. These funds have been passed on to organizations that enjoy good relations with the Palestinian terror organization Hamas.[13] Some national branches of IR are led by Islamists drawn from the social milieu of the Muslim Brotherhood, the very organization responsible for the term “Islamophobia.” This word has always been used to deflect from or trivialize Islamic anti-Semitism or misogyny, and it was Linda Sarsour and other prominent activists, who have managed to introduce the term to the mainstream.

There is still no consensus on when and where and by whom the word “Islamophobia” was first used, but Pascal Bruckner writes, “The aim of this word was to declare Islam inviolate. Whoever crosses this border is deemed a racist. This term, which is worthy of totalitarian propaganda, is deliberately unspecific about whether it refers to a religion, a belief system, or its faithful adherents around the world.”[14] Khaled Lamada, who is currently holding office at the U.S. branch of IR, is a prominent Egyptian-American supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood. His social media account shows the R4BIA symbol and praises the “Jihad” of the “Mujahidin of Egypt” and Hamas because of “the many defeats they have cost Israel.”[15] Lamada posted a video that claims that Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the Egyptian president, is involved in a Jewish conspiracy against the Muslim Brotherhood.[16] Another Islamic Relief U.S. employee, Yousef Abdallah, circulated on Facebook a story that idolizes “martyrs” who provided weapons that went on to “kill more than 20 Jews” and “fire rockets on Tel Aviv.”[17]

No word is uttered about this rampant Islamic anti-Semitism when Linda Sarsour is asked about the issue of hatred of Jews. Instead, she says this:

I think a conversation about anti-Semitism is so critical at this moment […] as we have anti-Semites basically in power in the White House but being really critical about what anti-Semitism actually means, because often times it’s used by the right wing against Palestinians and those who are pro-Palestine to make the overgeneralization [that] because we are pro-Palestine, because we are pro-justice, that must mean that we are anti-Semitic, or, because we’re critics of the state of Israel, that means that we are anti-Semitic.[18]

“The pink tidal wave” where around 500,000 people joined the Women’s March in Washington D.C. the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 21, 2017.

The myth of Zionist Apartheid

In 2016, when asked about her then recently published book, Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement, political activist Angela Davis remarked, “Palestine represents what, it seems to me, South Africa represented in the 1980s and up until the end of Apartheid,” and “Palestine seems to me that pivot that allows us to enlarge, broaden and extend our consciousness.”[19] During her keynote speech at the Women’s March on Washington, she demanded the end of incarceration of Assata Shakur and Mumia-Abu Jamal, who were—like Davis—members of the Black Panther Party (BPP) and who murdered American policemen.[20] In the 1960s, the Black Panther Party worked with the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).[21] The PLO, until the revisions of its manifesto in 1996 and 1998, called the founding of Israel “illegal,” denied Jews the right to a state of their own, and propagated the Intifada: “Ideological doctrines, whether political, social, or economic, shall not distract the people of Palestine from the primary duty of liberating their homeland. All Palestinians constitute one national front and work with all their feelings and material potentialities to free their homeland.”[22] The BPP also collaborated with the terrorist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) that hijacked planes in 1968, 1970, and 1976 and took almost exclusively Jewish Israelis as hostages while letting everyone else go.[23] Mumia Abu Jamal trivialized these crude acts of anti-Semitism and called Jews the new Nazis and Israel a state of apartheid in a 2002 article titled “Blitzkrieg in Palestine.”[24]

There is no racial segregation in Israel remotely close to that which used to dominate South Africa: Arab Israelis have the same rights as Jews, they have been allowed to passively and actively vote at the Knesset elections for decades, they are partly members of the Knesset,[25] they are part of the government and the supreme court, they work as diplomats,[26] they do not have to serve in the Israeli army (Israeli Defense Forces),[27] and Arabic is one of the two official languages in Israel.[28] Restrictions of the rights of Arab Israelis are security measures which are urgently called for in times when Jewish Israelis are stabbed with knives and run over with cars by Arab Israelis and bombarded by the terrorist organization Hamas. But critics like Sarsour never utter a word about the fact that the surrounding Muslim countries do not support Palestinian refugees via infrastructure or medical treatment and that their governments restrict Palestinian immigration. Mahmud Abbas and Yasser Arafat, leaders of the PLO and the Palestinian region, rejected attempts at a peaceful two-state solution made by the Israeli government in 2000, 2008, and 2014.

So woke

Linda Sarsour knows how to switch from empowered and empowering hijabi feminist to victim within an instant whenever she runs out of arguments. At a speech in 2017, she asked arrogantly:

Can somebody remind me of a staunch pro-Israel organization that has come out in support or stood up against the killing of unarmed black people by law enforcement in this country?! If you know, I wanna know who they are, because I don’t see that happening, right?!… The same people that justify the massacres on Palestinian children and civilians in Palestine and call it collateral damage are the same people that will find excuses to justify murder of unarmed people in this country by law enforcement.[29]

What happened shortly afterwards was proof of anti-Semitic resentment outweighing solidarity and empathy with the black people, proof that reminded everyone of the BDS campaign against Soda Stream: When Zionist Jews tried to take part in the New York March for Racial Justice on October 1, 2017, in order to take a stand against racist police violence, they were asked to take down their signs. The signs themselves called for unity of Jews and black people within the movement. The Zionists were then accused of hijacking the demonstration and making Palestinians like Sarsour feel unsafe. In her speech, she later said that she felt scared because of some of the signs she had seen at the demonstration.[30] The argument of fear was also embraced and instrumentalized by queer feminists at the Chicago Dyke March in 2017. An activist was asked to leave the demonstration because of her Star of David/Pride flag.[31]

Sarsour and her allies seem to care about neither universal emancipation nor about maintaining the right of physical integrity of women, homo and bisexuals, trans people and non-Muslims in the Middle East. Sarsour says the following about Israel, the only very liberal country in that area:

Is there room for people who support the state of Israel and do not criticize it in the movement? There can’t be in feminism. You either stand up for the rights of all women, including Palestinians, or none. […] There’s just no way around it. There is no country in this world that is immune to violating human rights. You can’t be a feminist in the United States and stand up for the rights of the American woman and then say that you don’t want to stand up for the rights of Palestinian women in Palestine. It’s all connected. Whether you’re talking about Palestinian women, Mexican women, women in Brazil, China, or women in Saudi Arabia—this feminist movement is an international global movement.[32]

Linda Sarsour, Islamist of the Year 2017

Alongside the title of raging anti-Semite, Linda Sarsour has also very much earned the title of “fake feminist” given to her by the Somalian ex-Muslim women’s right activist and critic of Islam Aayan Hirsi Ali. Hirsi Ali bestowed this title on Sarsour when the organizers of Women’s March wrote on their official website, “We honor and respect tribal laws and jurisdictions.”[33] This position is reminiscent of the aforementioned Farrakhan, who publicly declared his opposition to a revision of homophobic sodomy laws in Central America.[34] Farrakhan accused women of undermining the American family as they made their way into the workforce during and after World War II instead of taking exclusive responsibility for reproduction work and child nurturing at home. Farrakhan also references the Koran when deeming homosexuality a sin and propagates the idea that homosexuals will find themselves in Sodom and Gomorrah after their deaths.[35] Sarsour was first called a “fake feminist” after she tweeted the following about Hirsi Ali, a victim of female genital mutilation: “Brigitte Gabriel=Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She’s asking 4 an a$$ whippin’. I wish I could take their vaginas away—they don’t deserve to be women.”[36] It was also Ali who pointed out that Sarsour had propagated sharia law on Twitter in 2007[37] and 2015.[38] When asked about the severely patriarchal conditions in Muslim countries, this is Sarsour’s reaction: There are Muslim countries who have women presidents for God’s sake. In Saudi Arabia - ur boogeyman Islamic state, women r in parliament.”[39] On the same day, she had to say something about the hijab as an instrument of real apartheid, namely the Muslim segregation of the sexes: FYI - mandated head covering for Muslim women in Saudi Arabia is the LEAST of their worries. Stop making it THE ISSUE. It’s not.”[40]

These statements are overflowing with cultural relativism and factual contradictions, which is ironic, seeing as how the American New Left has for some time accused the Alt-Right movement of being “post-truth.” Saudi women were allowed to vote passively and actively for the first time, and exclusively at the municipal level, in 2015, although some encountered “difficulties proving identity and residency” and there were “only a limited number of registration centers, according to Human Rights Watch.”[41] Saudi women voters were not allowed to speak to male voters and had to use segregated campaign offices. This year, Saudi women will be allowed to drive cars for the first time without a male guardian.[42] Whether or not women will be allowed to walk the streets by themselves was not debated. A side note that has not gained sufficient attention is a 2007 article from Al Arabiya that cites Linda Sarsour: “She, however, will not ask her own daughters to go through an arranged marriage, Linda said. All she wants is for them to choose someone who is Muslim and Arab, and that will be traditional enough.”[43] In that same interview, Sarsour said that arranged marriages do not disturb her because she does not believe in marriages for love, because the arranged form of marriage is Islamic tradition and because her parents as well as her husband agreed to let her go to university. In a Western democracy such as the U.S., Sarsour claims to be in favor of being able to voluntarily decide whether or not to wear a hijab or to accept an arranged marriage, ergo to voluntarily decide whether or not to embrace and partly propagate misogynist traditions.

Universalism versus Umma

On topics like Islam, the New Left has, since its postmodern, identitarian turn, been obliged to listen exclusively to Muslim women who were raised in the West. Since the matter of universal and radical demands (as represented across the globe by the Old Left, by Communist parties, and by Second Wave Feminism) was dropped in favor of particularity, dividing lines have been drawn between men and women, black and white, cis and trans, etc., culminating in theories like intersectionality. Sarsour’s supporters keep forgetting, however, about two terms, the usage of which they otherwise normally love to inflate: privilege and agency. Women in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Iraq, etc. do not have either of them. Sarsour does. For such women, wearing a hijab or marrying a stranger is not a choice, nor is studying at a Western university. The voices of Vida Mohaved (the arrested Iranian protester known as the woman waving her white hijab on a stick), Mina Ahadi (an Austrian-Iranian, ex-Muslim human rights activist), and Aayan Hirsi Ali remain to be silenced by women who—like Sarsour, and the rest of the left—have embraced Islamism.

But why would someone who calls themselves an advocate for social justice embrace misogyny and anti-Semitism? According to the terms of intersectionality theory—a theory that sees only black or white and contrasts “oppressors” on the one hand with “oppressed” on the other hand—Jews have been deemed white and therefore “racists” and “oppressors,” especially when they are Zionists or wealthy. Within the black community of Crown Heights, New York, the tensions of residents feeling “oppressed” by former Jewish tenants and (by that time) Jewish landlords ended in a three-day riot in 1991 after a 25-year-old rabbi accidentally killed a seven-year-old black boy with his car. A 29-year-old Jew was then killed by a group of black teenagers.[44] Nowadays, the American left so passionately supports the Black Lives Matter movement, which, on the one hand, has managed to raise important questions on, and mobilize against, racist police brutality, racial profiling, and many more struggles facing the black community, even as, on the other hand, it has repeatedly made headlines due to the anti-Semitism of some of their participants.[45] Since the left also deems black people, next to Muslim women, the new revolutionary subject simply because of the discrimination they face due to racism, no critical word is uttered about violent acts of anti-Semitism by the black community. Another reason why one cannot find any leftist sources on incidents like the one in Crown Heights or anti-Semitism that associates Jews with money is that the left itself has been acting structurally anti-Semitic. Instead of analyzing matters of class and capitalism as a whole in a Marxist tradition, the left has become a protest against the rich and against major multinational companies. But long before WWII, when the National Socialists divided capital into the productive (“schaffende”) sphere of “honest German labor” and the sphere of finance capital, Jews had been accused of greed. Anti-Semitic resentment will live on as long as capitalism lives on—and this anti-Semitic resentment will also live on within the left. Hence, Jews don’t have agency either, except when anti-Semitism is articulated and acted upon by white supremacists. While the identitarian left keeps using subjective victimhood as a political point of reference instead of striving for radical social change, there is no place for Jews to be seen as victims of discrimination since, in the Manichean view of intersectionality, postcolonialism, and queer feminism, they are almost always seen as “oppressors.”

Within American identity politics there exists a hierarchy of victimization in which American society, through colonialism and slavery, has discriminated against black people the most. Therefore, some parts of the black community see themselves (or have been seen by others) as in competition with the Jewish victims of the unprecedented Holocaust. The fact that Libya is still selling Nigerians as slaves on markets and torturing them does not seem to be a problem for the American left, because—thanks to postcolonialism—only Western countries can be accused of “oppression.”[46] As soon as contradictions arise within this perspective, one simply does not speak of them out loud; and if such contradictory incidences are addressed at all, they are dismissed as “isolated” or explained away as “the results of Western colonialism and racism.”

This also counts when it comes to Muslim women. Yes, Muslim women have to some extent been victims of anti-Muslim racism since 9/11, but, at other times, as in Sarsour’s case, they are Islamists. They are considered to be Non-White and, therefore, “oppressed,” “survivors,” or “heroes” who need to be empowered or who can empower others against “white supremacy.” From a global perspective, however, the oppression from which Muslim women (as well as atheist women and women of other religious backgrounds) suffer most is patriarchal violence and that violence must be named, analyzed, and fought, no matter where it presents itself. The Left keeps contradicting itself when it comes to human rights. It considers it racist to say that patriarchy is worse in Iran than it is in the West, that patriarchy takes on other shapes and forms than it does in the West.

The Left can surely carry on calling Trump the only “oppressor” and worshipping Muslim women as the new revolutionary subject. The Left can surely carry on fighting wars for LGBTIQs and women without demanding radical structural change. But this is exactly one of the reasons why the Left is dead: Everything that the Left used to fight for—universal human rights and a society in which everyone can be different without living in fear (whether of capitalism or of patriarchy)—has eroded into a self-contradictory identity politics. |P

[1] Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour), Twitter Post, November 11, 2016, 2:35pm, https://twitter.com/lsarsour/status/797206161737076737.

[2] Nathan Guttman, “Linda Sarsour Makes Glamour’s Women of the Year List,” Forward, October 30, 2017, https://forward.com/fast-forward/386467/linda-sarsour-makes-glamours-women-of-the-year-list/.

[3] Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler), Twitter Post, January 2, 2018, 9:14am, https://twitter.com/Liz_Wheeler/status/948241059506614272.

[4] Women’s March (@womensmarch), Twitter Post, January 27, 2018, 10:31am, https://twitter.com/womensmarch/status/957320217796882432.

[5] Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour), Twitter Post, July 4, 2017, 8:06am, (Retweet @CharlesMBlow), https://twitter.com/CharlesMBlow/status/882254344879341568.

[6] Carmen Perez (Msladyjustice1), Instagram Photo, November 21, 2016, https://www.instagram.com/p/BNDLpbGFrlc/?taken-by=msladyjustice1&hl=en.

[7] Tamika D. Mallory (tamikadmallory), Instagram Photo, May 11, 2017, https://www.instagram.com/p/BT9wDcUBShs/.

[8] Anti-Defamation League, smarch/status/957320217796882 March 20, 2015: https://www.adl.org/sites/default/files/documents/assets/pdf/anti-semitism/united-states/farrakhan-in-his-own-words-2015-03-20.pdf.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Wali Fard Muhammad, Facebook Post, May 5, 2017, https://www.facebook.com/wali.muhammad.18/videos/10212901551278040/.

[12] Women’s March, “Women for Syria,”: https://www.womensmarch.com/womenforsyria/.

[13] Sam Westrop, “How American Charities Fund Terrorism,” National Review, January 12, 2017, www.nationalreview.com/article/443773/terrorist-groups-american-charities-fund-them-and-should-stop.

[14] Pascal Bruckner, “The Invention of Islamophobia,” Sign and Sight, March 1, 2011, http://www.signandsight.com/features/2123.html.

[15] Khaled Lamada (Sharing a Facebook Post from Yahya Bayad, January 1, 2014), Facebook Post, January 2, 2014, http://standforpeace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Screen-Shot-2017-08-01-at-15.10.05.png.

[16] Khaled Lamada, Facebook Post, April 22, 2014, http://standforpeace.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Screen-Shot-2017-08-01-at-15.13.30.png.

[17] Yousef Abdallah (Sharing a Facebook Post from Maali Turk September 1, 2014), Facebook Post, September 1, 2014, .

[18] Inspirational Speakers, “Linda Sarsour on anti-semitism 3 31 2017,” YouTube video, 1.24 mins, June 4, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1mbhfgOP_4.

[19] Democracy Now!, “Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Angela Davis on Ferguson, Palestine & the Foundations of a Movement,” YouTube video, 8:14 mins, March 28, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gQBgCf0MAs.

[20] Marland X, “(FULL) Angela Davis SPEAKS at Women’s March in Washington, DC 1-21-2017,” YouTube video, 7:01, January 22, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LKQRXYyRn8; Timothy Williams, “Execution Case Dropped Against Abu-Jamal” New York Times, December 7, 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/us/execution-case-dropped-against-convicted-cop-killer.html; Tim Walker, ”Assata Shakur: Black Militant, Fugitive Cop Killer, Terrorist Threat... or Escaped Slave,” The Independent, July 18, 2014, www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/assata-shakur-black-militant-fugitive-cop-killer-terrorist-threat-or-escaped-slave-9616001.html.

[21] Matthew Quest, “The Black Panther Party and Palestine Solidarity,” http://transculturalmodernism.org/files/mvo/2011-01-30/black_panther_paoesitinian_solidarity.pdf.

[xxii] “Palestinian National Charter of 1964,” Palestinian Media Watch, www.palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=640&doc_id=8210.

[23] Alex Lubin, Geographies of Liberation: The Making of an Afro-Arab Political Imaginary (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2014).

[24] Mumia Abu-Jamal, “Blitzkrieg in Palestine,” Workers World, May 2, 2002, www.workers.org/ww/2002/mumia0502.php.

[25] Lahav Harkov, “The 20th Knesset by the Numbers: More Arabs and Women, Fewer Orthodox Members,” Jerusalem Post, March 18, 2015, www.jpost.com/Israel-Elections/The-20th-Knesset-by-the-numbers-More-Arab-and-female-Mks-fewer-ultra-Orthodox-lawmakers-394305.

[26] Deroy Murdock, “Arabs are Prominent in Israel’s Government,” National Review, November 25, 2013, http://www.nationalreview.com/article/364746/arabs-are-prominent-israels-government-deroy-murdock

[27] Paul Goldman, “Arab Israelis Are Joining the IDF In Growing Numbers: Officials,” NBC News, February 26, 2017, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/arab-israelis-are-joining-idf-growing-numbers-officials-n724586.

[28] Regine Borja Guevara, “Arabic as an Official Language of the State of Israel,” Jerusalem Post, July 22, 2017, www.jpost.com/Opinion/Arabic-as-an-official-language-of-the-State-of-Israel-500444>>.

[29] Stop The Lies, “Linda Sarsour claims supporters of Israel are anti-black lives,” YouTube video, 6:01, April 8, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2ZBb0jQd74.

[30] Taly Krupkin, “Linda Sarsour at Racial Justice March: ‘It Is Not My Job to Educate Jewish People That Palestinians Deserve Dignity,’” Haaretz, October 2, 2017, https://www.haaretz.com/usnews/.premium-1.815218.

[31] Laurel Grauer, “The Chicago Dyke March Preaches Inclusion. So Why Was I Kicked Out for Carrying a Jewish Pride Flag.” Haaretz, June 26, 2017: www.haaretz.com/us-news/why-was-i-removed-from-dyke-march-over-jewish-flag-1.5488777.

[32] Collier Meyerson, “Can You be a Zionist Feminist? Linda Sarsour Says No,” The Nation, March 13, 2017, www.thenation.com/article/can-you-be-a-zionist-feminist-linda-sarsour-says-no/.

[33] Women’s March, “Guiding Vision and Definition of Principles,”: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/584086c7be6594762f5ec56e/t/587ffb20579fb3554668c111/1484782369253/WMW+Guiding+Vision+%26+Definition+of+Principles.pdf.

[34] Blabbeando, “Louis Farrakhan: Central America’s Remaining Anti-Gay Sodomy Statute must not be Repealed.” YouTube video, 2:57, March 10, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkOUP8YCor4.

[35] JoinTheNationofIslam, “Farrakhan speaks about Family & Homosexuality,” YouTube video, 10:11 September 23, 2009, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrRBc-fWBgQ.

[36] Women In The World Staff, “Ayaan Hirsi Ali Says Controversial Women’s March Organizer is a ‘Fake Feminist,’” Women in the World, February 2, 2017, http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2017/02/02/ayaan-hirsi-ali-says-controversial-womens-march-organizer-is-a-fake-feminist/.

[37] Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour), Twitter Post, March 1, 2011, 5:24am, https://twitter.com/lsarsour/status/42575904601411584.

[38] Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour), Twitter Post, May 12, 2015, 8:12pm, https://twitter.com/lsarsour/status/598327052727615488.

[39] Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour), Twitter Post, January 28, 2015, 8:21pm, https://twitter.com/lsarsour/status/560653839477780481.

[40] Linda Sarsour (@lsarsour), Twitter Post, January 28, 2015, 8:18pm, https://twitter.com/lsarsour/status/560653103004139520.

[41] Michael Pearson, “First Women Elected to Office in Saudi Arabia,” CNN, December 14, 2015, http://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/13/world/first-women-elected-to-office-in-saudi-arabia/index.html.

[42] Martin Chulov, “Saudia Arabia to Allow Women to Obtain Driving Licences,” The Guardian, September 26, 2017, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/26/saudi-arabias-king-issues-order-allowing-women-to-drive.

[43] Yasmina Hatem, “Arranged marriages ‘alive’ in Brooklyn,” Al Arabiya News, December 21, 2007, https://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2007/12/21/43183.html.

[44] Nicole Brown, “Crown Heights Riots of 1991: A Look Back at Gavin Cato’s Death and the Racial Unrest that Followed,” AMNewYork, August 18, 2016, https://www.amny.com/news/crown-heights-riots-of-1991-a-look-back-at-gavin-cato-s-death-and-the-racial-unrest-that-followed-1.12184841.

[45] Jonathan Greenberg, “Black Lives Matter’s hypocritical anti-Semitism,” The Washington Times, August 23, 2016, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/23/black-lives-matters-hypocritical-anti-semitism/.

[46] “Migrant slavery in Libya: Nigerians Tell of Being Used as Slaves,” BBC News, January 2, 2018, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-42492687.

6 comments

  • Posted 9 months ago

    “Sarsour’s supporters keep forgetting, however, about two terms, the usage of which they otherwise normally love to inflate: privilege and agency. Women in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Iraq, etc. do not have either of them. Sarsour does.”

    This is simply false. I am not saying that it is “not my experience,” I am saying that it is literally false that women from Muslim countries universally lack privilege and agency. I wonder where such an impression could have come from. How many Muslim women does this author know? How many Muslim countries has she been to? I only know a dozen or so but that is more than enough to refute this impression.

    This is a very interesting post. I was planning on writing a submission for Platypus about 1917 and 1968. I now see that the magazine is far closer to the Antideutsche, pro-Iraq War wing of the left than the anti-imperialist, postcolonialist, anti-Zionist wing. I have learned a lot from this article but it is probably not what the author intended at all.

    by A.M. on March 8, 2018 9:37 am
  • Posted 9 months ago

    Please note: We do not endorse ANY of the view we publish, but invite critical discussion of ALL positions on the avowed “Left,” premised on our founding declaration that “The Left is dead! — Long live the Left!”

    For a viewpoint opposed to that of the article above, please see for example:

    https://platypus1917.org/2011/03/01/german-psycho-a-reply-to-the-initiative-sozialistisches-forum/

    by Chris Cutrone on March 8, 2018 10:03 am
  • Posted 9 months ago

    Aside from the critique of concrete political phenomena such as the growing popularity of islamism in feminist circles and an lack of sensibility for the ideology of antisemitism, the essay obviously lacks an adequate historical-materialist analysis of specific and more sophisticated problems such as the postmodern condition of the contemporary left and its manyfold implications and possibilities. Its postmodern condition is portrayed as a conscious choice, a subjective turn. Here it is clear that the author is unable to or rather does not distinct between postmodernity and postmodernism. The former being the current stage of capitalist mode of production. Its genesis being the deterritorialization of the fordist shape of the sphere of production because of its crisis. Fordism, which is named as Late Capitalism or Industrial Society by Adorno, had significant influence on not only the sphere of industrial production with its furthering synthesis of capital and the state but also on the ideological superstructure.The Fordist or Keynesian break of the prior anarchy of production with the regulation of market-movements lead to an ideological antagonism of two main „Grand Narratives“ (Lyotard) on a geopolitical scale: US Liberalism/Conservatism VS Soviet Marxism. Both these Ideologies (here used as not pejorative [false consiousness] but as a term for a worldview as such in a leninist sense). What these two have in common is their upholding of the possibilty of absolute truth. But the notion of absoluteness in these two Ideologies is but the superstructural reflection of an absolute totality of production which emerged with fordism. A characteristic of industrial society which the Frankfurt School strongly criticized. The mechanisms of western fordism on a world-market scale also shaped the (non)-mode of production of stalinist USSR and its ideological state apparatuses as Marcuse remarked in „Soviet Marxism“. With the crisis of fordism because of the intensified antagonism between productive forces and mode of production it finally collapsed. Its characteristics dissolved and they began to re-configurate. With the emergence of new information technologies a significant shift from production to distribution happened. Market-Mechanisms and their openly destructive forces were unleashing. This stage is called post-industrial society or Postmodernity. The proletariat that still had a notion of unification because of their integration in the industrial complex now found itself not only multiplied but in precariousness. With this the left lost its picture of the proletariat as the masses of industrial workers. Neoliberalism arrives from the future. This shock of (only seemingly) loosing its traditional clientele is one of the main factors of the contemporary or postmodern state of the left. The new condition of course triggered a restructuring of the ideological superstructure according to its material patterns that are „power-leveled (…) flat and (…) wet“ (Nick Land). With this base the ideological notion of the non-existence of absolute knowledge found its ground. The traditionally arborescent hirarchy of knowledge transformed into a rhizomatic network of fluid information. This process is accelerated by the emergence of the World Wide Web and the specific dynamics of social networking giving birth to „alternative facts“ etc. This material conditions are the primary cause for the postmodern state of the left and society as a whole. This theoretical and practical regression that leads to the affirmation of islamism is by far not an individual or subjective choice. It is rather a necessity. Contemporary The ignorance of the left in regard of Marxism is much more connected to its fatal defeat in the early 20th century than it its current regression. So: The material conditions still determine consciousness in last consequence. The usual „antigerman“ interpretation of postmodernism is thus left-hegelian at its best and ironically smells of the very identity politics it thinks it negates via Pseudo-Materialism. Another note:
    The notion of the Nazis first dividing the category of capital into „good“ „productive“ labour and finance capital is absolutely ahistorical. It was the marxist theoretician Hilferding who made remarks on the existence of finance capital and its relation to industrial capital in Imperialism. His theory of finance capital, which is vulgar but still not of the same caliber as the fetishism of Nazis, later influenced Bukharins, Lenins and Luxemburgs theories of Imperialism respectively. Even the Wertkritik-School postulates a specific significance of the valorization of finance capital which they identify with Marx‘s category of fictitious capital in the Critique of Political Economy. The Wertkritik-Interpretation of finance capital is thus not one bit antisemitic but still an inadequate or mysticist interpretation of Capital. That aside the denunciation of the BPP totally ignoring its historical development heavily reproduces the anti-communist ressentment of ideologycritical Critique of Ideology. The pathological urge of Antigermans to conserve bourgeois society by all means is engraved in the whole text. A society, which positive gains are undermined by bourgeois society itself. Marx postulated, as Adorno agreed in his „Marginalien zu Theorie und Praxis“, that only the revolutionary implementation of the dictatorship pf the proletariat could save civil rights from its destruction.

    Behold! The chimera of german Maoism: The Trashcan of „Ideologiekritik“

    Sincerely,

    Z. S.

    by ZS on March 8, 2018 1:52 pm
  • Posted 9 months ago

    I actually think they get Linda Sarsour right, she says things like so what if women aren’t allowed to drive cars in Saudi Arabia. But they of course they get Israel very wrong. At the end of the day being an anti-zionist Democratic Party shill takes a lot of cognitive dissonance.

    by Bryce on March 8, 2018 2:37 pm
  • Posted 9 months ago

    Tina Sanders can’t stand any criticism of Israel. Sarsour comes across much better in Sanders’s quotation of her in the article, which makes the point that ALL states in the world deserve criticism, indeed deserve overthrowing:

    Is there room for people who support the state of Israel and do not criticize it in the movement? There can’t be in feminism. You either stand up for the rights of all women, including Palestinians, or none. […] There’s just no way around it. There is no country in this world that is immune to violating human rights. You can’t be a feminist in the United States and stand up for the rights of the American woman and then say that you don’t want to stand up for the rights of Palestinian women in Palestine. It’s all connected. Whether you’re talking about Palestinian women, Mexican women, women in Brazil, China, or women in Saudi Arabia—this feminist movement is an international global movement.

    by Chris Cutrone on March 11, 2018 9:51 am
  • Posted 9 months ago

    What is the intended audience for this piece? I like reading left critiques of the left. Don’t get me wrong, I’m big on circular firing squads. But when you’re talking to a bunch of Marxists, I don’t think you can just baldly assert things like “the antisemitic BDS movement”, “Arab Israelis have the same rights as Jewish Israelis”, “Hamas is a terrorist organization full stop”. To be blunt, you’re gonna have to unpack those a bit if you don’t want to be laughed out of the room.

    As it is, if you define BDS as essentially antisemitc right out of the gate, that smells like the old canard that anti-zionism is anti-semitism, and it undermines the argument that follows re: the anti-semitism of a particular leftist.

    Here is a good take on the supposed equal rights of Arab Israelis: https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2012/02/jewish-state-citizens-israel

    by JP (@roadtoserfdumb) on March 18, 2018 10:52 pm

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: